BOL Meet – 5th June 2005
Here is a gist of the book review conversations.
MWC: Though that this book was an easy read. Felt that there was too much hype surrounding the book and that she expected much out of it, but was disappointed. Overall rating: 2.5 out of 5. She skipped quite a few pages since the events were so predictable and made for boring reading. The entire book was written facetiously and had to be read in the same vein. She also pointed out the difference in the two primary chapters of the book viz. life in the burbs and life in
ARF: Did not like the book, since could not relate to the story in anyway. However gave it a few points for some humor. Liked the character of Changez, an Indian immigrant who travels to
Bored: Also did not like the book and felt that this was a common affliction amongst Indian writers writing English novels. What Hanif Khureshi was trying to market in this novel was novelty of his mixed cultural background, and he does not do a very good job at it. Besides Charlie all the characters lacked depth and were not detailed very well. Hanif Khureshi does not detail emotions and relationships very well, since no relationship had been detailed to the fullest. Overall Rating: 2 out of 5
Sourin: Basically most of what everyone had detailed in their conversation and also the story felt disjointed in many parts. Throughout the reading of the novel, I kept asking ‘Where is he going with this ?’. None of the characters at the end of the novel stayed in memory and there were sections or intents that didn’t seem very coherent. Overall Rating: 0.5 out of 5.
Of course, we flitted between various different topics like the social structure of Britain during the 60’s and 70’s, the ambiguity of the age of the characters in the novel, sexual ambivalence of Karim, psyche of immigrants particularly Indian, to the West, relationship of Changez and Jamila and the fact that Changez accepts a child sired by Jamila and another man, and the writings of Salman Rushdie which was unanimously agreed as boring and rambunctious. Overall the reviews for ‘The Buddha of Suburbia’ book were not very enthusiastic and one can only conclude that the author was flitting in and out of a doped demeanor or blissful inebriation while penning this novel. My personal recommendation: magnanimous waste of time.
4 Comments:
Cool...thx for the summary.. frm the books for the next discussion, looks like it will be a better read.
Ajay
Nice Sourin. Even though the book lacked it made for a good discussion.
Thanks for putting the meeting summary up on your blog.
And you have summarised the critiques pretty well too.
Ashutosh
I am one of the unfortunate who couldn't make it to the BOL meeting. I agree with all of you that the book was a disappointment. The title of the book is a little misleading, while it suggests it may be about haroom it is mostly about Karim. Karim is a typical teenager who drifts in the currents of experimentation, adventure,inferiority,race to better himself and finally realization. I liked the fact that he comes of age finally and doesnt like the wild ways of Charlie and can sort out his emotions about his parents and Allie and friends Changez and Jamilla. After Karim, I liked the characters of Jeeta and jamilla.
The topic that stands out: Allie's discussion on racism- At least the blacks have a history of slavery...But no one put people like u and me in camps, and no one will. we can't be lumped in with them..What is meted out to immigrants is a result of their decision and they have to invent ways to overcome it or ignore it. As cream discovered- money could be instrumental.
Post a Comment
<< Home